Skip to content

  • Home
    • About US
    • Objectives
    • Vission
    • Misson
    • Officials
    • MoUs
  • Research Fields
    • Our Research Fields
    • On Going Projects
    • Completed Projects
  • e-Journal :
    • Editorial
    • Peer Review Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Author Guidelines
    • Upcoming Issue
    • Submit an Article
    • Archives – Jnanamudra
  • Manuscripts
    • Preservation
    • Digitization
  • Digital Library
    • Books
  • Gallery
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • e-Courses
    • Course
    • Elegiblity
    • Application
    • FAQs
  • Contact us

Peer Review Policy

Peer Review and Publication Policy

The JNANAMUDRA makes the blind peer review process, where the reviewers and authors remain unidentified throughout the review procedure.

Every proposal submitted for publication is read at least by an editor, for an initial review. If the paper agrees with editorial policies and with a minimum quality level, is sent to two reviewers. The reviewers won’t know the author’s identity, as any identifying information will be stripped from the document before review. Reviewers’ comments to the editors are highly confidential and before transient on to the author will make unnamed. Based on the reviewers’ suggestions / comments, the Editorial Board takes the final decision on the satisfactoriness of the sent article, and connects to the authors the decision, along with referees’ reports. Whether significant revisions are proposed, acceptance is dependent on whether the author can deal with those satisfactorily.

Copyright © 2026 .

Powered by PressBook WordPress theme